Lawyers: Male lawyers must wear a white, rigid wing collar alongside a dark double-breasted suit with a bar jacket or court vest. Women lawyers must wear a dark suit with ribbons on a collar next to their bar jacket or waistcoat In the 17th century, only the elite wore powdered horsehair wigs. Those who couldn`t afford the best dress, but wanted to watch, wore wigs made of goat hair, rolled up cotton, or human corpse hair. There was also a regular trade involving living people selling their long hair for wigs, although horsehair remained ideal. However, the judiciary needed some time to convince; Portraits of judges from the early 1680s still show judges defiantly wearing their own natural hair, and wigs do not seem to have been widely adopted until 1685. Queen`s Council: A silk dress, a court coat and a waistcoat. On special occasions, a QC must wear a long wig, black pants, silk stockings, lace cuffs and buckle shoes. The full-bottomed wig was used for criminal trials until the 1840s, but is now reserved for ceremonial clothing; Smaller wigs are used in everyday life The outlet compares the wig to a uniform: “Like many uniforms, wigs are a symbol of anonymity, an attempt to distance the wearer from personal involvement, and a way to visually take advantage of the supremacy of the law,” Newton explains. Wigs are so much a part of British criminal courts that if a lawyer does not wear a wig, it is considered an insult to the court. The Middle Temple Library`s latest exhibit, “Legal Fashion,” features a history of English court dress from the 14th century to recent times. The exhibition, organized in partnership with the Middle Temple Archive, opened last month, coinciding with London Fashion Biennale. For Zoe Chapman, a lawyer at Red Lion Chambers, wearing a wig has sometimes been helpful in making sure it is recognized, “and I know that some of my BAME colleagues report that they have been confused with the accused on several occasions, for example in court. Instead of changing society to find a way to live a cleaner, healthier life, they decided to put wigs on instead, and it worked.
Instead of attacking people`s actual hair, lice would instead infest wigs, allowing people to shave their scalps or cover their natural hair with a cloth while a bunch of insects gathered on their wigs. In 1635, the final guide to court-keeping was published in the Judicial Code. But that didn`t lead to new costumes; He only determined which existing dresses should be worn when. It is clear that wearing wigs was not only a form of “dressing”, but a decisive influence on how the legal profession wanted to best represent itself. Although the wearing of wigs is still a debate today, some British judges believe it brings a sense of formality, power and respect to the court. The High Court, for example, was created by the Judicature Acts 1873-5 and absorbed the Courts of Chancery, Admiralty, Probate and Matrimonial Cases. This has led to a new dress dilemma; The trial judges of these courts used to wear simple black silk robes. Like the robes lawyers wear, wigs are worn as a symbol of anonymity, Newton said. Wigs are part of a uniform that creates a visual separation between the law and those educated before it. Wigs are so much a part of British criminal courts that if a lawyer does not wear them, it is considered an insult to the court. When it comes to trendsetters, no one has had a greater impact on British wigs than Louis XIV of France. During his reign from 1643 to 1715, the Sun King disguised his prematurely bald scalp – historians believe it was caused by syphilis – with a wig.
In doing so, he set in motion a trend widely followed by Europe`s upper and middle classes, including his cousin Charles II, the King of England (who is also said to have syphilis), who reigned from 1660 to 1685. Wigs bring solemnity to the process, he says, and “as a young lawyer, it certainly helps level the playing field. If you are against someone who has more experience, you feel that your physical appearance is not as important if you both wear wigs and dresses, as you will be recognized by the judge and jury as qualified to handle the case. “The court`s dress code has been challenged, and this is not a surprise. In 2007, a complaint was filed to change the dress code. The Lord Chief Justice, Baron Philips, said wigs “are no longer worn in civil or family cases and judges only need a robe”. In the same year, the Guardian launched a poll to win public opinion on the issue. 31% of the 2,000 respondents wanted civilian judges to keep their wigs on, while 68% thought criminal judges should keep them. But for lawyers who continue to wear wigs, including defence lawyers and others in court or the Court of Appeal, there is little enthusiasm for changing the status quo, according to James Mulholland QC, lead lawyer with more than 30 years of experience and president of the Criminal Bar Association. Wigs and dresses worn by judges and lawyers in the former British colonies are among the most blatant symbols of colonial legacy; a legacy so old-fashioned and uncomfortable that even British lawyers have stopped wearing it.t.co/T3aGEDw8yW pic.twitter.com/iqWBRTH8cW When he sat in Westminster Hall – then the court house – the coat was not worn; This has now been lifted for ceremonial clothing. And gray taffeta became increasingly popular as an alternative to pink taffeta, which was used for summer dresses. How strange and hilarious it was when you first went through your social studies book as a kid and realized George Washington wasn`t the only American OG.