Later in the 20th century, H. L. A. Hart attacked Austin for his simplifications and Kelsen for his fiction in The Concept of Law.  Hart argued that the law is a system of rules divided into primary (rules of conduct) and secondary (rules that allow public servants to administer the primary rules). The secondary rules are then divided into jurisprudence rules (to settle disputes), amendment rules (which allow laws to be changed) and recognition rules (which identify laws as valid). Two of Hart`s students continued the debate: in his book Law`s Empire, Ronald Dworkin attacked Hart and the positivists for their refusal to treat law as a moral issue. Dworkin argues that the law is an “interpretive concept” that obliges judges to find the most appropriate and equitable solution to a dispute, taking into account their constitutional traditions. Joseph Raz, on the other hand, defended the positivist view and criticized Hart`s approach to the “soft social thesis” in The Authority of Law.  Raz argues that the law is an authority, identifiable by purely social sources and without reference to moral reasoning. In his view, any categorization of rules beyond their role as authoritative instruments of mediation should be left to sociology rather than jurisprudence.
 Roman law was strongly influenced by Greek philosophy, but its detailed rules were developed by professional jurists and were very demanding.   In the centuries between the rise and fall of the Roman Empire, law was adapted to changing social situations and comprehensively codified under Theodosius II and Justinian I.  Although codes were replaced by customary law and jurisprudence in the early Middle Ages, Roman law was rediscovered around the 11th century when medieval jurists began to research Roman codes and adapt their concepts to canon law. Birth of Common Juice. For guidance, Latin legal maxims (called brocades) have been compiled. In medieval England, royal courts developed a precedent that later became common law. A pan-European law merchant was created so that traders could trade with common standards of practice, rather than the many fragmented facets of local laws. The merchant of rights, the forerunner of modern commercial law, emphasizes freedom of contract and the alienability of property.  As nationalism grew in the 18th and 19th centuries, the merchant of rights was incorporated into the local law of countries under new civil laws. The Napoleonic and German codes became the most influential. Unlike English common law, which consists of huge volumes of case law, codes in small books are easy to export and easy for judges to use.
Today, however, there are signs that civil law and common law are converging.  EU law is codified in the Treaties, but develops through a de facto precedent set by the Court of Justice of the European Communities.  Many statutes are specifically designed to protect certain categories of persons. Laws such as the Civil Rights Act (United States) and the Sex Discrimination Act (Australia) make discrimination illegal. These types of laws protect what are called “negative rights,” that is, the right to be free from something like discrimination. Anyone can be discriminated against, but as history shows, some people are more at risk. Laws designed to prevent discrimination based on race, sex, gender, religion and more protect these groups and give them better access to justice. A corollary of the rule of law is the existence of a legal profession sufficiently autonomous to invoke the authority of an independent judiciary; the right to assist a barrister in legal proceedings stems from this consequence – in England, the function of a lawyer or lawyer is distinct from that of a legal adviser.  As stated by the European Court of Human Rights, justice should be reasonably accessible to all and people should be able to anticipate how the law will affect them.  Anarchism was practiced in society in much of the world. Anarchist mass communities ranging from Syria to the United States exist and range from hundreds to millions.
Anarchism encompasses a wide range of socio-political philosophies with different tendencies and implementations. AWS are rules that bind everyone who lives in a community. Laws protect our overall security and protect our rights as citizens from abuse by others, organizations, and the government itself. We have laws that ensure our overall security. These exist at the local, state, and national levels and include things like: Religious law is explicitly based on religious commandments. Examples include Jewish halacha and Islamic Sharia – both of which translate to “way forward” – while Christian canon law also survives in some religious congregations. Often the implication of religion for law is immutable, because the Word of God cannot be changed or laws made by judges or governments.  However, a complete and detailed legal system generally requires human elaboration. For example, the Qur`an has a certain law, and it acts as a source for other laws by interpretation, Qiyas (reasoning by analogy), Ijma (consensus) and precedent. This is mainly contained in a set of laws and regulations known as Sharia or fiqh. Another example is the Torah or the Old Testament in the Pentateuch or the five books of Moses. It contains the basic code of Jewish law used by some Israeli communities.
Halakha is a code of Jewish law that summarizes some of the interpretations of the Talmud. Nevertheless, Israeli law only allows litigants to enforce religious laws if they wish. Canon law is used only by members of the Catholic Church, the Eastern Orthodox Church and the Anglican Communion. One person injured in a car accident in Charlotte, North Carolina, and one person injured in a car accident in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, both sustained bodily injuries. Again, there will be differences in the laws of the state, but because we are a country with established laws, there are remedies across the country when an injustice has been committed. The rule of law is a principle by which all individuals, institutions and bodies are responsible for laws that: Although military organizations have existed as long as the government itself, the idea of a standing police force is a relatively modern concept. For example, medieval England used the system of mobile criminal courts or assizes to use show trials and public executions to instill fear in communities in order to maintain control.  The first modern policemen were probably those in Paris in the 17th century, at the court of Louis XIV, although the Paris police prefecture claims to have been the first uniformed policemen in the world.  The problem with democratic life is that laws change over time. The laws needed in 1789, when the Constitution was born, and in 1890, 1950 or 1990, are different from the laws needed today.
Parliament must try to update laws as necessary, and the judiciary must interpret laws so that they apply fairly to society at that time. Recently, we have seen state and local governments pass laws that could cause us to question the limits of government power. For example: Although each country has laws and regulations that it expects from its citizens, they differ from country to country. Some are large and some are small. For example, in much of the United States, it is illegal to do jaywalk. It is not illegal to do jaywalk in the UK. In Singapore, chewing gum is illegal. It`s not illegal in the United States. In the United States, laws also differ from state to state and within cities.
Some laws are strange. For example, in North Carolina, it is illegal to rollerblade on a state highway or for drug dealers not to pay excise tax on the controlled substances they sell. In communist states such as China, the courts are often considered part of the executive branch or subordinate to the legislature; State institutions and actors thus exert various forms of influence over the judiciary.  In Muslim countries, courts often consider whether state laws conform to Sharia law: Egypt`s Supreme Constitutional Court can strike down such laws, and in Iran, the Guardian Council ensures that legislation is compatible with “Islamic criteria.”   The concept of the rule of law was particularly prevalent in the early founding of the United States.